The Dutch regulator wanted to go even higher. The law said no. But the message landed anyway.
We also recommend that you read:
Novatech Solutions N.V. just got hit with a €24.85 million penalty from the Kansspelautoriteit — the KSA, which is the gambling watchdog in the Netherlands. It’s the biggest fine the authority has ever issued. A second company, Fortaprime SRL, picked up a €1.8 million fine on the same day. Between the two, regulators pulled nearly €27 million out of unlicensed operators in one go.
Novatech ran Qbet.com and 55Bet.com. Neither site had a Dutch gambling license. Neither site blocked Dutch players from signing up. There was no age verification. No responsible gambling tools. And both platforms happily accepted crypto deposits and anonymous payment methods — which, predictably, caught the attention of anti-money-laundering investigators as well.
It wasn’t a case of missing one checkbox on a compliance form. Novatech skipped the entire form. They operated wide open in a regulated market, ignored every safeguard that licensed operators are required to maintain, and apparently assumed no one would bother coming after them.
The KSA bothered.
Dutch law puts a ceiling on regulatory fines: 10% of the company’s annual global turnover. That ceiling is what produced the €24.85 million number. KSA chairman Michel Groothuizen went on record saying the fine would have crossed €100 million if the statute allowed it.
He didn’t have to say that. Regulators usually let the fine speak for itself. The fact that Groothuizen went out of his way to publicly state the number he actually wanted to charge tells you something about the mood inside the KSA right now. There’s real frustration. Licensed operators spend millions on compliance. Unlicensed ones spend nothing and compete for the same players. That imbalance is exactly what enforcement actions like this are supposed to correct.
There’s also growing political support in the Netherlands for raising the fine cap. If that legislation passes — and similar discussions are already underway in other EU countries — future violations won’t have a 10% safety net.
The Novatech fine grabbed all the headlines, but Fortaprime SRL caught a €1.8 million penalty in the same sweep. This company ran a string of unlicensed brands: AmonBet, Supraplay, Bilucky, GXSpins, Kaasino, HiddenJack, and LuckyMax7. All accessible from the Netherlands, all without a license.
Fortaprime’s fine was smaller because the company’s turnover was smaller. The KSA applied the same 10% formula. Going after both operators at once was deliberate — it shows the regulator isn’t picking one target for a PR headline. They’re running systematic sweeps.
The Netherlands opened its legal online gambling market in October 2021 under the Remote Gambling Act. More than 20 operators hold licenses now. The system works, at least on paper. But the KSA itself estimates that 53% of all online gambling revenue in the country still ends up with unlicensed platforms.
Fifty-three percent. In a country with a functioning regulatory system and two dozen licensed casinos to choose from. The KSA also says 94% of Dutch gamblers use at least one legal site — but enough of them also play at offshore operations to push more than half the total money outside the regulated perimeter.
Why? The usual reasons. Unlicensed sites offer fatter bonuses with no wagering caps. No deposit limits. No mandatory cooling-off periods. No KYC checks asking you to upload your passport. For a certain type of player, that’s a more attractive package than what licensed casinos are allowed to offer. And until the cost of running those sites becomes unbearable, they’ll keep showing up.
The KSA’s strategy is to make that cost unbearable. Whether a €25 million fine achieves that is an open question, but the direction of travel is obvious.
The KSA doesn’t fine players. That’s not how this works. But if you have money sitting in an account at an unlicensed casino and the regulator shuts it down or freezes its payment processors, that money is gone. There’s no complaint form. No ombudsman. No segregated player funds. You’re playing at a site that has already demonstrated it doesn’t follow rules — expecting it to protect your balance is optimistic at best.
Licensed platforms carry costs that unlicensed ones don’t, and those costs ultimately pay for things like player fund protection, dispute resolution, and operational transparency. That’s the trade-off. You get slightly less generous bonus terms, but your money is actually accounted for somewhere.
The KSA fine happened in the same month as a pile of enforcement moves across multiple jurisdictions:
None of these things happened in coordination. Different countries, different timelines, different political motivations. But the net effect is the same: the regulatory walls are getting higher, the fines are getting larger, and the enforcement teams are getting bigger budgets. 2026 is turning into the year where regulators stopped warning and started billing.
The Novatech fine will be appealed — these things almost always are. Whether the €24.85 million holds, gets reduced, or gets upheld won’t change the broader trajectory. The KSA has shown it will use the full extent of its current powers, and there’s active pressure to expand those powers further.
For offshore operators targeting regulated European markets: the math is changing. For players: if your casino doesn’t hold a license in the market you’re playing from, you’re carrying risk that you don’t have to carry. There are enough solid, licensed options out there that gambling at a site with no oversight is a choice, not a necessity.
And if €25 million in fines doesn’t convince the remaining unlicensed operators and crypto casinos to rethink their approach, the next round of legislation probably will.